Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Stefan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Stefan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: He does meet the minimum NHOCKEY requirement #4 by being a First Team All-Star in a lower level minor league. Even with this, the article does not seem to meet GNG as there are only two second party articles (with one repeated from two different sources), both are about the only notable achievement has earned. Only one is actually about him, the other merely mentions him. This doesn't seem like he has significant coverage from multiple sources. But I could be wrong and if NHOCKEY is all that is needed, then Keep. Yosemiter (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yosemiter: he doesn't meet requirement #4, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment, the SPHL is not considered a lower-level league and confers no presumptive notability.Joeykai (talk) 04:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, my mistake, I forgot to check the LA. But as I stated, it still appears to fail the GNG (probably the main reason why the SPHL doesn't qualify for automatic qualification of #4 in the LA) Yosemiter (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He has yet to play at a significant level of competition and he fails WP:GNG. Deadman137 (talk) 00:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence proffered that he passes the GNG, and Joeykai is correct in pointing out that this guy plays in the rock-bottom minors. It's unsurprising that this is another of the many hundreds of GNG-failing substubs created by the infamous Dolovis. Ravenswing 19:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.